Hi Gabor, Thanks, but I felt that the main point of my emails was about whether it is feasible to make a statically compiled PDL distribution (or a distribution that ships with the needed libraries). That's a question for the PDL folk. The Padre part doesn't look difficult.
Daniel. On Sun, Jul 25, 2010 at 5:38 PM, Gabor Szabo <[email protected]> wrote: > On Sun, Jul 25, 2010 at 1:35 PM, Daniel Carrera <[email protected]> wrote: >> Hi guys, >> >> Here is an idea: >> >> * Make a statically-compiled version of the PDL module and shell. >> * Bundle it with the Padre stand-alone distribution. >> * Ship it and call it "Stand-Alone PDL". >> >> Now, like magic, we get the "one click install" we have been dreaming about. >> >> The Padre project already makes a stand-alone distribution that >> includes Perl itself and the core modules. Provided that we can >> statically compile PDL, it seems to me like it should be /easy/ to >> bundle it: >> >> 1. Unzip the Padre distribution. >> 2. Put the PDL directory inside perl/lib >> 3. Put the pdl shell inside perl/bin >> 4. On the top-level directory add two shell scripts: >> - 'pdl' calls the pdl shell with the appropriate parameters and path. >> - 'pdl-ide' calls Padre. >> >> What do you think? > > IMHO for this the best is to talk to Curtis Jewell, who is packaging > Strawberry Perl and Padre Stand-Alone and work it out with him. > I am CC-ing him on this but his contact info is here: > "Curtis Jewell" <[email protected]>, > and he is also frequent on #padre and on #win32 irc.perl.org > > regards > Gabor > -- Intolerant people should be shot. _______________________________________________ Perldl mailing list [email protected] http://mailman.jach.hawaii.edu/mailman/listinfo/perldl
