On 11/5/2010 11:33 AM, P Kishor wrote: > > The problem is solved by taking a different approach, > but I would sure like to understand what is going on. > > >> Many thanks in advance for helping me spot my silliness.
I haven't looked at the code but I had a similar difficulty that ended up being a lingering reference to a piddle that kept the previous value "alive". --Chris _______________________________________________ Perldl mailing list [email protected] http://mailman.jach.hawaii.edu/mailman/listinfo/perldl
