Hi Chris, all,

I gotta say that all of these ideas look good, but my heart is not in
them, except possibly working on PP warnings, general documentation,
and the PDL book. The two driving factors for my interests these days
are (1) finishing and releasing my own new plotting module based on
the Prima toolkit, and (2) giving an introduction to PDL at the next
Chicago PerlMongers meeting (late October). The first item involves
some very sophisticated code generation, and my efforts to document my
own code generation machinery has led me to study the PP Rules very
closely. As a side effect, I may update the documentation to PDL::PP
as well as work on warnings for strange items when PP is parsing
things. The second item may lead to me to work on the documentation
for slices as well as PP, and maybe even take up the PDL book.

I hate to come out and say "I'll be working on X" because I often end
up not getting much work done after such pronouncements. However, the
two underlying motivations aren't going away. I use my plotting
library already in my work, and I *will* be giving a talk at the PM
meeting. So the chances of this stuff getting done is higher than in
the past, I hope.

Another item that I would be interested in working on, but is likely
to slip through the cracks, is the callback slice operation, which
should probably actually be called 'on_change' instead. That has great
potential for use as well as improvement. If I end up using it in my
plotting library, I may work on it and submit it. Otherwise, I'll need
enthusiasm from the community to finish it.

David

_______________________________________________
Perldl mailing list
[email protected]
http://mailman.jach.hawaii.edu/mailman/listinfo/perldl

Reply via email to