I just noticed there is a Cprodover function in PDL::Complex that does
what I expected prodover would do. Maybe they should be synonyms when
acting on a complex type. I also noticed that the code for sum works
only on 2D complex arrays (i.e., 3D piddles), not for an arbitrary n-D
case.

Best regards,
Luis
(already posted in https://sourceforge.net/p/pdl/bugs/339/)

On Sun, Aug 31, 2014 at 10:01:32PM -0500, Luis Mochan wrote:
> Dear Chris,
> 
> > This is a known problem with PDL complex number
> > support.  Please feel free to add any discoveries to
> > this ticket:
> > 
> >   https://sourceforge.net/p/pdl/bugs/339/
> Done. Thanks for the advice.
> Luis
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Perldl mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://mailman.jach.hawaii.edu/mailman/listinfo/perldl
> 

-- 

                                                                  o
W. Luis Mochán,                      | tel:(52)(777)329-1734     /<(*)
Instituto de Ciencias Físicas, UNAM  | fax:(52)(777)317-5388     `>/   /\
Apdo. Postal 48-3, 62251             |                           (*)/\/  \
Cuernavaca, Morelos, México          | [email protected]   /\_/\__/
Consider using GnuPrivacyGuard https://www.gnupg.org/
My key: 791EB9EB, C949 3F81 6D9B 1191 9A16  C2DF 5F0A C52B 791E B9EB, yours?




_______________________________________________
Perldl mailing list
[email protected]
http://mailman.jach.hawaii.edu/mailman/listinfo/perldl

Reply via email to