> See recent discussions in comp.lang.perl.*.  Brian d Foy indicated
> that he felt this FAQ was getting too involved and that if the true
> answer was to be included then other stuff must be lost. Global

I don't have the bandwidth for clpX.

It's my opinion that you're still snipping too much potentially useful
things out.  Maybe it needs to be split into two entries.  People
still learn perl poorly, and still write things "the old bad way" that
need to be fixed.

But anyway, I'd like someone else to chime in.

-R

Reply via email to