It was Thursday, August 07, 2003 when Brian McCauley took the soap box, saying: : [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Robert Spier) writes: : : > What is tainting? (I know. I'm being rhetorical.) That seems outside : > the scope of the question. : : OK here's an alternative, simpler version, without any mention of : tainting.
I think it should not mention eval() either. This would encourage use of a terrible idea. It's neat, yes, but terrible. The FAQ entry is fine as is. At most, the entry could go on to explain that any usage that's more complex than this should use a templating system, which there are many on the CPAN. Casey West -- "In case of fire, do your utmost to alarm the hotel porter." --In a Vienna hotel
