Matthew Astley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Tue, Mar 06, 2001 at 12:04:46PM +0000, Piers Cawley wrote:
> > Adam Spiers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> >> It looks like add_pass is something we (Brian?) added. I like it,
> >> and I think we should take advantage of it -- I'd prefer us to
> >> improve on JUnit and then document unexpected differences rather
> >> than aim for a 100% clone. Does that conflict with other people's
> >> ideas of the goals of PerlUnit?
>
> [...]
>
> > I'd still like to see something that looks just like the default
> > JUnit behaviour, if only so that folks can have consistent test
> > output in environments where they're working in both java and perl
> > (say).
>
> FWIW my opinion is to improve on JUnit by default (the existing
> behaviour is a little odd), and folks doing unified JUnit/PerlUnit
> tests are bright enough to switch to 'TestRunner::StrictXUnit' or
> whatever, as Piers suggests.
Hey, I don't care what the default is, just that we should try and
provide something that's strictly the same as well.
--
Piers
_______________________________________________
Perlunit-devel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/perlunit-devel
