From: "Adam Spiers" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> I think we should do something about the confusing structure of the
> cvs tree ASAP. It's been mentioned before IIRC, but I can't remember
> if anything was decided.
>
> Firstly, does anyone have any objections to cvs
> removing Test-Unit-0.06? (This won't stop anyone being able to
> retrieve it if they really want, of course.)
No, I'd say get rid of it. It's on the CPAN, too, if someone really wants
it.
(No real reason for that though.)
> Secondly, it's unclear to newbies (including me ;-) what UnitTests/
> and api/ are there for. Again, I vote we cvs remove, as this reduces
> confusion while maintaining accessibility.
They are still left from the very beginning of this project.
I'd say remove them, too.
> Thirdly, ideally we would rename Test-Unit-0.1 to Test-Unit, or maybe
> src (although src is already the name of the cvs module for some
> reason). The problem with this is that sourceforge doesn't allow us
> access to our repository, so we'd have to copy everything over, cvs
> add, and cvs remove, losing all existing history. Hence the need to
> do it ASAP, unless we could persuade sourceforge to mangle the
> repository or something.
Renaming to Test-Unit is definitively the way to go. Test-Unit-0.1 is
only there (with a version number, I mean) because of historical reasons.
Cheers,
Christian, back from three days out of home and house.
_______________________________________________
Perlunit-devel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/perlunit-devel
