[again, and again from 9th April]

I've bunged another selftest in the 't' directory. It just checks that
all the examples give the expected output - my penance for breaking
them last time. I suspect it might be a little too sensitive, but it's
a start.

It's written without HarnessUnit, partly because it doesn't need that
and also so that won't be a show-stopper if it breaks. Oh, and it will
probably break under Windoze because of the stderr redirection. 8-(
Any suggestions?


I'm contemplating making a Debian package of perlunit, mainly so I can
roll forwards/backwards without messing about. I'm not an official
developer but there's no reason why I can't get registered and boost
our eyeball count. Will this be of any use to anyone else?


Matthew  #8-)

_______________________________________________
Perlunit-devel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/perlunit-devel

Reply via email to