Adam Spiers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Weaver, Quinn BGI SF ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
>> > From: Adam Spiers [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
>>
>> > Time for a quick poll; can we reach a consensus on whitespace policy?
>>
>> I'm with you.
>
> Cool :-)
>
> While we're at it, another quick poll:
>
> my $self = shift;
> my $arg = shift;
>
> or
>
> my ($self, $arg) = @_;
>
> ?
>
> IIRC some of my cow-orkers here benchmarked it and found that the
> latter was noticeably faster.
I prefer the former of the two options. I think it reveals your
intention better (and makes life easier for the refactoring browser
I'm working on...). However, my current favourite is:
my $self = shift;
my($arg1, $arg2, @foo) = @_;
(Note the lack of space between my and the opening brace...
> I've added a coding conventions section to doc/consensus.txt for this
> stuff. With the presence of the various branches around, I think it's
> important that we only edit doc/consensus.txt in HEAD.
Frankly, I'd like to see PDC_REFACTOR merged ASAP, but I think there
might be a few more modules to move around, I'm really not keen on the
Test::Unit::TestFoo style, and, from discussions elsewhere, I think
it'd be a good idea to move Test::Unit itself into
Test::Unit::Procedural. There seem to be a fair few folks at the
moment who think that Test::Unit is the main interface to PerlUnit.
--
Piers
"It is a truth universally acknowledged that a language in
possession of a rich syntax must be in need of a rewrite."
-- Jane Austen?
_______________________________________________
Perlunit-devel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/perlunit-devel
