Adam Spiers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Piers Cawley ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
>> Adam Spiers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> > A nice idea, but surely this wheel has already been invented in some
>> > way? Why not just do something idiotically simple like sticking the
>> > test libraries in the `t' directory, and then put
>> >
>> > use lib 't';
>> >
>> > in your t/*.t? (Or better, hack Makefile.PL, or god forbid,
>> > ExtUtils::Makemaker, so that a `make test' includes -It as an option
>> > when running the tests.)
>>
>> Well, it's sort of dependent on where you run the script from.
>> Actually I'm more inclined to stick the *modules* in t/tlib (I'll
>> explain why it has to be tlib in a minute) and then do
>>
>> use lib 't/tlib', 'tlib';
>>
>> So that you can run the tests from either the project root or from
>> inside the t directory. It has to be tlib instead of lib to avoid
>> using the files in lib/* rather than blib/*.
>
> Yep, sounds good. It doesn't look like there's any hook in MakeMaker
> so we could persuade it to add these to @INC directly, hmph. Although
> doing it that way would break running the tests directly (isn't that
> deprecated however?)
Dunno about deprecated, it can be damned useful.
> I can do this right now if you want me to.
Go to it.
--
Piers
"It is a truth universally acknowledged that a language in
possession of a rich syntax must be in need of a rewrite."
-- Jane Austen?
_______________________________________________
Perlunit-devel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/perlunit-devel
