On 09/16/2013 10:02 PM, Benoit Claise wrote: > > In the use case of the ISP monitoring my access device & link, the ISP > has got anyway some personally identifiable information (PII) for his > monitoring. And this is what I'm expecting as a customer .... when I > call them, complaining about _my _link quality.
Fair enough. OTOH, large organisations do tend to leak out information once enough people need access (cf. NSA and Snowden:-) so one might argue that having a well defined way to keep that PII private as you send it to and then have it stored/processed in the ISP may well be worthwhile. (And granting special access to some customer support applications.) > However, in the regulator use case, monitoring my access link, I don't > want to share any PII. More promising:-) So, I guess there ought be an argument for applying some of the Good-PRISM/RFC6325 techniques in lmap? If so that's good to hear. (If not, or probably not, be interested in that too.) Cheers, S. _______________________________________________ perpass mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/perpass
