On Sep 17, 2013, at 4:12 AM, Stephen Farrell <[email protected]> wrote:
> > Hi, > > Jeff raised tcpcrypt [1] in his earlier email. I personally thought tcpcrypt was an awesome idea. It was, IIRC, "down talked" by some of the people who have been more instrumental in blocking other solid security suggestions, like zRTP. Possibly even for technical reasons, but that's a debate worth reliving. Perhaps we could also consider a "policy" level of document, perhaps a BCP, that sets high goals for security and surveillance resistance in all new work. A formal declaration that fundamental security IS a priority, that protocols lacking it "harm the Internet" just as badly as those lacking congestion control. -- Dean
signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail
_______________________________________________ perpass mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/perpass
