Folks, Preliminary agenda for the IETF is out [1] with this session slated for Wed 1pm. That could change but frankly I doubt it given the constraints for this one. (But don't blame me if it does:-) Our session will be preceeded by a tech-plenary Wed morning that'll also discuss this topic, but (I hope:-) at a higher level. (That's also described in [1] and is why our session is unlikely to move.)
I've yet to see any comment on this agenda and am underwhelmed with volunteers for scribing etc. Be nice if those both changed... Cheers, S. [1] https://datatracker.ietf.org/meeting/88/agenda.html On 10/04/2013 02:12 PM, Stephen Farrell wrote: > > Hiya, > > The IAB and IESG had our BoF call last week and approved > the perpass session. Scheduling is being discussed now > and a draft agenda for the overall IETF meeting is due > out soon, but as always don't plan any travel around that > until the agenda is final. (Planning for the spending the > entire week at the IETF is of course the best thing:-) > > The goal of our session will be to level-set in terms > of what the IETF can realistically do, and then to > construct a list of actions (with willing victims:-) > that can be followed up in the IETF. > > The draft agenda we're considering is below. > > minutes - topic > 0000 - intro, agenda bash > 0010 - overview pressie > 0040 - open mic, have we level-set? > 0060 - threat model > 0070 - hard and open topics > 0080 - high level on more use of tls > 0090 - privacy bcp > 0100 - open mic, comments on pressies, what's missing? > 0120 - summarise actions, open-points > 0150 - end > > Since our face to face time is limited and highly valuable, > we're aiming for these slot to discuss concrete and specific > things the IETF should be doing, that are tractable and where > we've some idea that someone is willing and able to do the > work. (We've got some folks who are willing to lead the > various bits of discussion so no need for now to offer to > do that.) > > Spending too much time on how stuff works or how soemone > might have broken something is probably not the best use > of our time at this session. > > Comments on the above draft agenda are welcome. > > And we'll want good note-takers in addition, so if you're > willing to volunteer for that let Sean and I know. > > Cheers, > S. > _______________________________________________ > perpass mailing list > [email protected] > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/perpass > > _______________________________________________ perpass mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/perpass
