I suspect the President of Brazil would be very interested in a BCP on Mandatory to Use TLS for SIP. :-)
But the Government of Brazil has the Authority to Act as a protocol police, the IETF does not. -----Original Message----- From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Stephen Farrell Sent: Wednesday, October 09, 2013 6:59 PM To: Peterson, Jon; Richard Shockey; 'perpass' Subject: Re: [perpass] mandatory-to-implement vs. more? On 10/09/2013 11:44 PM, Peterson, Jon wrote: > A BCP could > however provide the necessary motivation for using TLS in the > situations where it will actually help, and the recent revelations > make that case rather eloquently. I'm confused by that a bit - given the GCHQ/Belgacom example, in which situations would running SIP over TLS never help? Note that I've not yet argued for MTU at all, so that's a real question. S. _______________________________________________ perpass mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/perpass _______________________________________________ perpass mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/perpass
