This is a good discussion.  I do want to add that we should not forget that 
there are some simple education issues that we have not made enough progress on 
yet.  How many of you find yourself explaining to small companies (and even 
some big ones), that they should not be sending your personal data over email?  
This seems to happen to me and luckily, I was able to head it off before it 
happened the last few times.  As we work to bridge gaps, it will take time and 
we may need to figure out education options as we work to improve security 
options.

Bets regards,
Kathleen  

-----Original Message-----
From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of 
Avri Doria
Sent: Monday, October 14, 2013 9:43 AM
To: perpass
Subject: Re: [perpass] mandatory-to-implement vs. more?


Hi,

On 14 Oct 2013, at 08:47, Tony Rutkowski wrote:

> So as many have opined, the IETF is a
> technical standards body, not an evangelical organization for 
> socio-political views, and hopefully will continue to do what it does 
> well - produce usable protocols - and leave the implementation choices 
> to others based on their assessment of the risk.


Yes, but in doing so, it should provide the ability for the individual users, 
whether companies or individuals, to mitigate their risks.  If technical 
standards do not include a mandatory option (MTI) of privacy protection they 
are making a political techno-decsion against privacy.  If the Internet cannot 
be used in a manner that enhances privacy, for those who value privacy, but 
only maximizes surveillance based security for those who value surveillance, 
then it looks to me like we are acting evangelically.

We can only maintain the belief that our technology and protocols are neutral 
if they can be used by people of diverse socio-political views.

So while I can see problems with MTU, I think genuine MTI (and perhaps some 
MTU) is needed for privacy enhancements at a level that matches the MTIs and 
MTUs for security.  I technical neutrality requires it.

avri
_______________________________________________
perpass mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/perpass

Reply via email to