Just to clarify, I was not suggesting that anyone in the WG is an NSA mole.
The model I had in mind was more one where someone on the classified side decides that a certain proposal would close a zero day vulnerability that they plan to exploit. A plausible argument is then constructed as to why this would be a bad idea and this is farmed out to people who cross the internal/external line without an explanation as to why. If you read Sun Tsu, this is the bit about the unknowing spy. My point was that I think we have to be a lot more careful about arguments that end up leaving the Internet insecure.
_______________________________________________ perpass mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/perpass
