On 10/24/2013 01:47 AM, Richard Barnes wrote:
> I can sort of see the dogfood / Right Thing To Do argument.  But it seems
> kind of silly to waste the bits / cycles encrypting things whose entire
> point is to be public.

Not everything that goes in or out of ietf.org via
SMTP is public. See ombudspersonage discussion for
example. Or nomcom. For most lists, yes, this isn't
much of a deal over and above dogfood consumption.

S


> 
> --Richard
> 
> 
> 
>>>
>>> -Jim
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> perpass mailing list
>>> [email protected]
>>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/perpass
>>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> perpass mailing list
>> [email protected]
>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/perpass
>>
> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> perpass mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/perpass
> 
_______________________________________________
perpass mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/perpass

Reply via email to