On Oct 21, 2013, at 7:32 AM, Nicholas Weaver <[email protected]> wrote:
> "I don't trust .com, I don't trust .ru, but I trust they won't collude > against me" is a very interesting property I have thought about this from a game theory point of view. Imagine a game where both player saw all the traffic pass though an under sea fiber optic cable. And then on some day in the future neither player can see any of the traffic unless they one player enables the other. Obviously if they both cooperated, they would be back the how it was at the start of the game. The question of if they will cooperate or not seems to me to depend on how they both use the data they used to get from the fiber optic cable, and the calculus of value of the information to them vs the value of the other player not having the information. I get your point but I'm pretty cautious about assumption of who will and will not cooperate when people feel the end result justifies pretty outrageous means of getting to the end result. That said, I'm a fan of the types of check and balances you get when more than one person has to behave badly. _______________________________________________ perpass mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/perpass
