On 10/24/2013 03:07 PM, Cullen Jennings (fluffy) wrote: > > On Oct 24, 2013, at 3:00 AM, Stephen Farrell > <[email protected]> wrote: > >> >> >> On 10/24/2013 06:47 AM, Cullen Jennings (fluffy) wrote: >>> >>> The biggest thing I would add to this Agenda is a discussion of >>> additional standards work the IETF could do to help the >>> situtation. >> >> Fair point. That is the main goal of the session but I can make it >> clearer. > > Sounds good - as long as that's the goal, I'm not worried about the > agenda. Changes looked fine.
Cool. > Do you expect one of the slot to discuss building secure email > systems, or IM, or collaboration? Would that be in PHB section? Yep. Though it'll be ultra-brief in terms of presentation I'd say. We don't want to aim to present or develop solutions during the session (bet we can't resist trying though;-) but rather to identify work that's tractable, that could make a difference etc. > (And I do realize how packed the agenda is here and that not > everything will fit - I'm just trying to figure out what range of > things is in scope) If need be, Sean and I have kept the saag agenda light so we have some time for follow-up there if that's needed. That's on Thursday, same time (1300) same room (Regency D). "What's in scope" is also in scope btw:-) And of course if folks want to start threads on the list in the meantime, esp for things they think should be in scope but haven't been much discussed so far, that'd be even better... Cheers, S. > > >> >> Also, the idea of Scott's slot towards the end is that he'll be >> building a summary/plan for things we should be doing as the >> meeting progresses and will pop that up near the end as about the >> last thing to discuss. Not minutes/action-items as such but more an >> attempt to capture exactly what you're after above as a plan. >> >> Cheers, S. >> >>> >>> >>> On Oct 21, 2013, at 9:48 AM, Stephen Farrell >>> <[email protected]> wrote: >>> >>>> >>>> Hi, >>>> >>>> I've posted a draft agenda [1] as previously outlined. >>>> >>>> Comments still welcome - folks are starting to make the >>>> various (small) bits of slideware so agenda-bash comments this >>>> week would be most useful. >>>> >>>> Thanks to Paul Wouters and Karen O'Donoghue for volunteering >>>> to scribe. One or two more might be useful - if you're up for >>>> it, just mail Sean and I. >>>> >>>> Ta, S. >>>> >>>> [1] https://datatracker.ietf.org/meeting/88/agenda/perpass/ >>>> _______________________________________________ perpass >>>> mailing list [email protected] >>>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/perpass >>> >>> _______________________________________________ perpass mailing >>> list [email protected] >>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/perpass >>> >>> > > _______________________________________________ perpass mailing list > [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/perpass > > _______________________________________________ perpass mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/perpass
