On Nov 12, 2013, at 8:32 PM, Stephen Farrell <[email protected]> wrote: > The converse argument was just made on the TLS list yesterday to > the effect that there's no point in TLS 1.3 (or a TLS 1.2 extension) > encrypting SNI because its the same as the obviously cleartext DNS > query in many cases.
That's a terrible argument. Then every eavesdropping issue becomes a chicken-and-egg problem, because nobody is willing to go first. _______________________________________________ perpass mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/perpass
