On Fri, Nov 15, 2013 at 5:59 AM, Alexey Melnikov <[email protected]>wrote:
> On 13/11/2013 12:52, Phillip Hallam-Baker wrote: > [...] > > In addition we would want to require end to end encryption and signature >> (for spam control). The ability to restart transfers that were previously >> aborted in mid session would also be useful. >> > Coincidently this was already done for SMTP: > http://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc1845.txt. I even implemented it in 1999. > It is one of the few HTTP protocol extensions I see value in. The other area that could be fixed in a new protocol would be to provide a mechanism that allowed gateways to add disclaimers to messages without breaking the message signature. -- Website: http://hallambaker.com/
_______________________________________________ perpass mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/perpass
