IESG Approval isn't a document status, it's a policy definition for namespace value assignment.
It looks to me like RFC 6761 could have been better phrased. It describes the registry and says that to add to it, an RFC must be published that specifies new entries and the entries must be categorized either IESG Approval or Standards Action... for how they are approved as registry entries. It does not (mean to) say that the RFC itself should have status of IESG Approval. Scott
_______________________________________________ perpass mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/perpass
