Given how long it took to seethe end of http/0.9, it will be decades before http 2.0 is everywhere
And some of the design choices might mean it does not happen at all. It could be another ipv5 or like http NG. That is the choices that must be made, not the decisions. The solution set might be null Don't assume success is automatic, that is likely to cause failure. Sent from my difference engine On Dec 7, 2013, at 7:08 PM, Bruce Perens <[email protected]> wrote: -------- Original Message -------- Subject: Re: [perpass] perens-perpass-appropriate-response-01 Date: Sat, 07 Dec 2013 15:28:02 -0800 From: Bruce Perens <[email protected]> <[email protected]> To: Jacob Appelbaum <[email protected]> <[email protected]> On 12/07/2013 02:11 AM, Jacob Appelbaum wrote: You're not being forced to do anything, are you? You could use HTTP 1.1 forever, right? Once there's an HTTP 2.0, broad support for HTTP 1.1 on the web will not survive. What I don't understand is why all of these people you've given me a long lecture about, including yourself, will necessarily be oppressed if they have a choice, and will not be oppressed if they have no choice. And why I have so little sympathy for them, according to you, simply because I would like to offer them a choice. Thanks Bruce _______________________________________________ perpass mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/perpass
_______________________________________________ perpass mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/perpass
