-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On 12/9/2013 5:23 AM, Stephen Farrell wrote:
>> That >> >wouldn't be appropriate, in my opinion. A working group must consider >> >the operational realities that it is attempting to code to. There are >> >many tensions to consider, not just a narrow view of network management >> >(a phrase that might itself be left to ambiguous interpretation). > "Operational realities" is far more vague IMO. Perhaps even dangerously > so since it could be used to attempt to justify pretty much anything. That is also my interpretation/fear here. :-/ - - ferg -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: PGP Desktop 10.2.0 (Build 2317) Charset: utf-8 wj8DBQFSpiqbq1pz9mNUZTMRAqmRAKDvetOQM3wAAD5q/NqMNSVRL/7yxgCdGOdD 7kOXcUdQiPWaxZmpptdNmiw= =U5uT -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- -- Paul Ferguson PGP Public Key ID: 0x63546533 _______________________________________________ perpass mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/perpass
