I think it looks well-intentioned, but from the interview, it also seems worryingly clear that the political sponsor has little or no understanding of the technicalities - and not just from a techie point of view. His 'description' of what this looks like from an end-user point of view doesn't fill me with confidence. So, I worry that legislation will evolve on the basis of a very shaky foundation, in terms of clarity of requirements, achievable/measurable outcomes etc.
R Robin Wilton Technical Outreach Director - Identity and Privacy Internet Society email: [email protected] Phone: +44 705 005 2931 Twitter: @futureidentity On 9 Dec 2013, at 17:04, Al Clark wrote: > I'm encouraged by the political impulse behind this, but I do wonder about > the cost of implementing it and whether it will meet its stated goals. That > it's coming from California is also heartening, again on the political level. > > > 2013/12/9 Lucy Lynch <[email protected]> > On Mon, 9 Dec 2013, manning bill wrote: > > piecemeal approach - a fact of life in todays environment. > > http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/the-switch/wp/2013/09/25/author-of-california-online-eraser-law-its-not-always-easy-to-find-the-delete-button/ > > > binding is easy, revocation is hard. > > > > /bill > Neca eos omnes. Deus suos agnoscet. > > _______________________________________________ > perpass mailing list > [email protected] > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/perpass > > > _______________________________________________ > perpass mailing list > [email protected] > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/perpass > > _______________________________________________ > perpass mailing list > [email protected] > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/perpass
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
_______________________________________________ perpass mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/perpass
