> 29 dec 2013 kl. 23:11 skrev Watson Ladd <[email protected]>:
>
> On Sun, Dec 29, 2013 at 4:26 PM, Stephen Farrell
> <[email protected]> wrote:
>>
>>
>>> On 12/29/2013 09:12 PM, Paul Hoffman wrote:
>>> On Dec 29, 2013, at 11:12 AM, Stephen Farrell
>>> <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>
>>>> . . .
>>>
>>>> I would love to see ongoing detailed work within CFRG as to how to
>>>> counter pervasive monitoring.
>>>
>>> Wearing your perpass hat, how can CFRG help? I ask this because I
>>> have seen little on the perpass mailing list that indicated that an
>>> even minor problem has been lack of crypto, or the use of crypto that
>>> is thought to be breakable. What type of crypto research or
>>> assessment would help perpass?
>
> Sending to perpass to get feedback on this question.
>
>>>
>>> Note that deprecating the use of crypto that is widely known to be
>>> broken is the purview of IETF WGs, not the CFRG. The relevant WGs
>>> (particularly TLS) seem to already be doing that.
>
> I don't agree with this assessment: the BCP Yaron Sheffer wrote on
> depreciating RC4 got kicked
> to the newly formed UTA WG, which
huh? who did what to what?
the uta list is just barely open and we've hardly hardly had time to get
organized, let alone decide which drafts to take on.
lets take a deep breath & settle down
Leif
> has done nothing with it. The
> biggest changes here have
> been AGL pushing stuff into Chrome, but he can't do the server side
_______________________________________________
perpass mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/perpass
