On Wed, Jan 15, 2014 at 8:10 AM, Stephen Farrell <[email protected]> wrote: > I'd be interested if someone wanted to start work on some > WG-chair/shepherd guidance for how to consider pervasive > monitoring. That'd likely take a while to get baked, and > would maybe end up not (just) as an RFC, but as training > material and/or an IESG statement or something, but could > easily start as an I-D. Any takers?
I think we already have a lot of it. (1) Add RFC6973 to BCP72. (2) Keep moving the perpass-related drafts forward, and add them as they become mature. (3) In the shepherds writeup template, have a question such as "(18) Describe the Document Shepherd's review of the security considerations section (see BCP 72 for guidelines), especially with regard to its consistency with the body of the document." Scott _______________________________________________ perpass mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/perpass
