Hi all. I am new on this list. My proposal is to develop "inverse firewalls".
I.e. if data is being sent out and the new destination address is different than the one which was "ok-ed" the last time before, the sending person shall be asked whether he really wants to send out this data. Similar to when someone has forgotten to add a subject line to his outgoing email and is asked whether by mistake or deliberately. This would prevent clandestine data steals. Heiner -----Ursprüngliche Mitteilung----- Von: Avri Doria <[email protected]> An: perpass <[email protected]> Verschickt: Mi, 12 Feb 2014 4:26 pm Betreff: [perpass] PM review get-together in London Hi, I have been informed that we have a spot for a get together of those who are interested in, or already doing, PM reviews of IETF drafts and RFCs: Assigned Room: Hilton Meeting Room 5-6 Assigned Date: 03/03/201 Desired Start Time: 11:30:00 Desired End Time: 13:00:00 Scott Brim and I are working with Stephen to try and get this meeting coordinated. We will float a tentative draft agenda in next few days and are attempting to get a rudimentary starting point I-D in place by the deadline so that there is something to start from. The I-D will largely be a collection of points made in various other I-D and RFC's as well as comments that can be culled from the discussions that have been going on in this list and others. thanks avri _______________________________________________ perpass mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/perpass
_______________________________________________ perpass mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/perpass
