To save time and hot air in London, I'm wondering about a couple of things concerning PM reviews:
1) Won't PM review just be folded into the regular security review for future documents? If so, a new effort is only needed for reviewing past work. 2) As a Gen-ART reviewer, I'm wondering whether Gen-ART should add it to our (virtual) checklist of issues, or can we leave it entirely to the security review. Do we need to discuss these points at Monday lunchtime? Regards Brian Carpenter On 19/02/2014 00:04, Avri Doria wrote: > hi, > > In order to figure out whether we have a sufficient size room I have > been asked to initiate a doodle poll on "Attend IETF perpass mtg on 3 > March 2014." > > Please follow the link in order to participate in the poll: > http://doodle.com/7u73796tkvbukfi4 > > thanks > > avri > _______________________________________________ perpass mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/perpass
