Hiya, On 02/24/2014 03:50 PM, Andreas Kuckartz wrote: > Stephen Farrell: >>> Explicit Trusted Proxy in HTTP/2.0 >>> draft-loreto-httpbis-trusted-proxy20-01 >>> http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-loreto-httpbis-trusted-proxy20-01 >> >> That is NOT an httpbis working group draft. > > That page explicitly says: > > "HTTPBis Working Group > Internet-Draft"
Yes, I think that was noted also on the WG list already but its true it looks a bit misleading. I'd assume that's unintentional though, its usually just someone starting from a wrong template which is very easy to do. > But I see that this does not imply that it has been voted on or > something like that. Well, we don't vote at all;-) But no, that I-D is just yet another I-D. The proxy topic is however being discussed so if you care, and have useful and informed technical things to say, please do subscribe and comment etc. To give another example: the above I-D you don't like is just as "official" as one I co-authored [1] suggesting a way to encrypt MPLS data which you'd maybe like better. Point is, neither is official at all. Both are just an inherent part of being open to anyone proposing stuff. And both will be processed in the usual way. Cheers, S. [1] http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-farrelll-mpls-opportunistic-encrypt > > Cheers, > Andreas > > _______________________________________________ > perpass mailing list > [email protected] > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/perpass > > _______________________________________________ perpass mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/perpass
