On Fri, Feb 28, 2014 at 2:48 PM, Kartoss <[email protected]> wrote: > Quoting from the Article: > > "GCHQ did not make any specific attempts to prevent the collection or > storage of explicit images, the documents suggest, but did eventually > compromise by excluding images in which software had not detected any faces > from search results - a bid to prevent many of the lewd shots being seen by > analysts." > > So for Communication without (GCHQ-)Surveillance, all we have to do is put > the Camera under our Desk and have no-pants meetings ?
My favorite quote from all this: "Unfortunately ... it would appear that a surprising number of people use webcam conversations to show intimate parts of their body to the other person," one document states, according to the Guardian. I love the understatedness... W W > > > Am 28.02.2014 15:32, schrieb Robin Wilton: > > And once again, the intelligence services manage to make "tinfoil hat" > privacy advocates look entirely rational, rather than paranoid. > > In fact, I'm struggling to think, offhand, of any privacy nut dire warning > that has not proved to be justified, or even slightly optimistic. > > Webcam stickers, anyone? > > > On 28 Feb 2014, at 14:17, Suhas Nandakumar wrote: > > http://www.theguardian.com/world/2014/feb/27/gchq-nsa-webcam-images-internet-yahoo > > > _______________________________________________ > perpass mailing list > [email protected] > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/perpass > > > > > _______________________________________________ > perpass mailing list > [email protected] > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/perpass > > > > _______________________________________________ > perpass mailing list > [email protected] > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/perpass > _______________________________________________ perpass mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/perpass
