On Jul 15, 2014, at 11:25 AM, Stephen Farrell <[email protected]> wrote:
> > Hiya, > > The DHC wg are in the process of re-chartering which > triggered a side-discussion on the IESG list with the > chairs about DHCP and possible information leakage. > > That is not any sort of pre-requisite for re-chartering > since its pretty much covered by the current charter > but after chatting the wg chairs figured it might be > worthwhile to raise the topic in Toronto and on their > list and see if there are folks who'd be interested > in helping out with a bit of work on e.g. documenting > DHCP privacy considerations. > > If that's of interest to you, and you have the time > and expertise, please volunteer to help. Mailing the > chairs would be the way to go for that- they're cc'd > on this. > > BTW, the DHC WG meeting is Wednesday at 0900. I've a > conflict for some of that time so may miss the slot. > (As always, offering to help will likely be appreciated, > whereas telling the WG their protocol isn't perfect > is likely less useful, so use judgement in helping:-) Dear Stephen, Similar considerations may also pertain to hybrid mDNS which is intended to automatically transfer mDNS resources into DNS to convey resources beyond the local link to overcome bridge multicast limitations. Regards, Douglas Otis _______________________________________________ perpass mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/perpass
