Hiya, I think this list has been really useful since we started it back in August 2013. We initiated a bunch of new work on here (e.g. cfrg curves, tcpinc, dprive, rfc7258) and I think the concerns dealt with here have influenced lots of other work in the IETF as well. Many thanks for all that great input and of course most of the things above aren't finished, but even so, we're now looking for some more great input:-)
The IESG will be meeting f2f in early May at our "retreat" and one of the topics on that agenda is "where next with perpass" so your ideas on that are very welcome. Please discuss those here and/or send 'em to the IESG or to some random AD or to me. But discussing 'em on this list is way better, and of course even betterer is to write an I-D (and please do point again at ones you've written, just to refresh folks' minds). While I do have some ideas, I'd rather not skew the discussion by throwing those out right now. I will also report back here after the IESG discussion. And just as a reminder, we've used this list mostly for very initial discussions and seen all chunky items of work handled elsewhere, be that in current WGs or by forming new WGs or whatever. I think that's been a good mode of operation so far, so we're not really asking here about how to change that, but rather for discussion of which topics we can usefully try handle in that same way over the coming year or two. So, fire away... Thanks, S. _______________________________________________ perpass mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/perpass
