"Christian Huitema" <[email protected]> writes: > Sent: Tuesday, October 20, 2015 11:29 AM, Linus Nordberg wrote: >> ... >> draft-josefsson-email-received-privacy-00 has been submitted, see >> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-josefsson-email-received-privacy/ >> >> I'd be interested in hearing what people on the perpass list think of >> this. > > Happy to see this! The text about email's Received field metadata has been > in drafts leading to RFC 7624 for more than a year, and it is very good that > someone active in the email working groups actually proposes a solution.
Thank you. > Now for a suggestion. Maybe that's a difference in personal writing styles, > but I found the draft a bit dry. I would have appreciated a discussion of > the scenarios, and a bit of emphasis on the "submission" part, which is the > most concerning for privacy. Agreed -- the draft was written hastily before the IETF -00 cut-off date and could surely benefit from a better introduction of the problem. If you have concrete suggestions on what to (or not) focus on in more detail, that would be appreciated. We will make a stab at improving this section shortly. /Simon
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ perpass mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/perpass
