"John R Levine" <[email protected]> writes: >> I am concerned about taking on a too wide scope. I think it may be >> possible to reach closure on improving the Received header wrt privacy. > > Perhaps, although all of that stuff is also useful for identifying > sources of malware, phishing, and other online evils. > > Assuming you agree that having someone's bank account credentials > stolen is a privacy problem, this is not a simple question, and any > simple answer is wrong.
Agreed. I'm merely concerned that if we can't come up with a solution to having someone's bank account credentials stolen, we shouldn't stall attempting to resolve smaller problems that we can identify, such as a privacy violation in the Received header. /Simon
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ perpass mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/perpass
