Hi, Out of rare curiosity I actually read the comments to the article. The take out was that people are both generally pissed off about all the mass surveillance, and they were proposing/suggesting/arguing various reasonably considered response arguments.
Of course there was a bit of flaming, but I was rather satisfied to see a collection of reasonable responses to the "encryption is dangerous" contents of the article. Of note was the general complaint that the site only uses http. So, whilst the tech community does its best to respond to the challenge of human rights abusing mass surveillance, some parts of the general community are learning/thinking about the problem and conversing about it. This, I take as the most positive part of this standard "encryption is bad" rubbish. Regards, Hugo _______________________________________________ perpass mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/perpass
