FYI. Contributions from folks here would be welcome if you're interested, Cheers, S.
PS: This relates to ongoing discussion on the TLS list. On 11/07/17 11:48, Stephen Farrell wrote: > > Hiya, > > I've asked the chairs for a slot in Prague to allow > for rebutting the claims made by the proponents of > the most recent wiretapping draft we're (sadly, still) > discussing. [1] > > So far the chairs seem un-keen, but I'm gonna keep > asking as I think having a rebuttal for this kind > of bad idea is needed. (And again, I'd prefer the > chairs ditch the entire idea of discussing this at > all.) > > In any case, and perhaps with a view to longer-term > documenting the arguments against the various "let's > break TLS" proposals we continually see, I've started > to collect some of those arguments in a github repo [2]. > > I would welcome contributions to [2] however folks > would like to provide 'em (but ideally via PRs) so > we can provide a nice crowd-sourced rebuttal in > Prague, either as a presentation or via a lively > mic-line if need be. > > Cheers, > S. > > PS: I've just started on this, but will go through > the list archive to extract others' arguments and > add acks. Not sure if that'll get done before we > end up in Prague but please do let me know if I've > used an argument you made so I can ack that later. > > [1] https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-green-tls-static-dh-in-tls13-01 > [2] https://github.com/sftcd/tinfoil > > > > _______________________________________________ > TLS mailing list > [email protected] > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tls >
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ perpass mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/perpass
