On Tue, 24 Sep 2002 09:18:49 +0330 Arash Zeini <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Wrote: > On Monday 23 September 2002 18:18, C Bobroff wrote:
> > Hey, that Konqueror seems to be the best of the non WinIE5+'s. Thanks! > > Well, Konqueror is just the BEST :) > At least it does handle Farsi quite well, as long as you use UTF-8. It does > it better than Mozilla, AFAICS. I don't know about Netscape 7. You are boiling my Blood Arash. lol. Konqueror being best? You must be kidding I mean we together saw a few days ago, how weak it is :-d . About it showing farsi pages better that other's, completely nonsense. You can view almost any farsi page with mozilla while you can't view most of them with konqueror. Just visit www.bbc.co.uk/persian and you'll see what I mean. Fact is, konqueror can only handle unicode. It's Unicode support might be bether than Mozilla, but to be honest no site is using unicode. About Netscape 7, it's just Mozilla 1.0.1 with some extra bunch of tools ( Some like those tools, some don't). So it's support can't compete with latest mozilla milestones like 1.1 or 1.2a . BTW: These kind of discussions are what ESR describes as flame wars. And these flame wars are useless and pointless. :-d cheers -- Aryan _______________________________________________ PersianComputing mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.sharif.edu/mailman/listinfo/persiancomputing
