Behdad Esfahbod wrote:
On Fri, 9 Jan 2004, Ali A. Khanban wrote:Mirrored is even better. It is more similar to the way I usually separate them in handwriting. Put the pen on a paper and then move it to the top and left, a natural number separator! Don't ask me for references, but I have seen many old people who use such a symbol for separating the thousands.
Roozbeh Pournader wrote:
On Thu, 2004-01-08 at 18:14, AmirBehzad Eslami wrote:I know it is kind of personal preferences, but I was wondering whether a
But don't you think shape of U+066C is very similar to sign of 'foot'
Depends on the font. Compare with <http://www.bamdad.org/~roozbeh/thsep.png>, for example.
right-faced comma-shaped character is suitable for the thousand
separator. I read from right to left when I see such glyph. Because
numbers are written and read from left to right, maybe a 180 rotation to
this character makes it more suitable.
It's a valid point. But I prefer it mirrored, not rotated.
|| |||| Ali Asghar Khanban || || Research Associate in Department of Computing ||||||| Imperial College London, London SW7 2BZ, U.K. || Tel: +44 (020) 7594 8241 Fax: +1 (509) 694 0599 ||||||| [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.doc.ic.ac.uk/~khanban ________________________________________________________________
_______________________________________________ PersianComputing mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.sharif.edu/mailman/listinfo/persiancomputing