On Sun, 6 Jun 2004, Roozbeh Pournader wrote: > new parts are not comparable in quality to Moin's work, with wrong > etymologies, bad definitions, etc.
That would be a problem. However, the bad entries can be edited out as they are discovered. > I don't agree. I believe the publisher has long time commercial interest > in this (and won't be able to understand that this will actually help > his sales, too). I wonder! > full, but that thing is clearly called "ghash-gir" if someone knows the > device and its name. Thank you for clearing that up! > No one cares for that, in a dictionary. A good dictionary should have > all the Academy-approved words, but it should list all the words in > usage, approved by the slow Academy or not. They can also be added as they get approved. -Connie _______________________________________________ PersianComputing mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.sharif.edu/mailman/listinfo/persiancomputing
