yeah actually I suspected that it does that :).
Rommer wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Janno Sannik wrote:
>
>> IdleTimeout seemes to work as expected, but as there is some child
>> processing request it won't make any new children and server was stalled
>> until that request (large file download) finished. Anybody know what
>> i'm doing wrong:? All children that allready exist work okay.
>>
>
> My function:
> static int total_processes(int child_num)
> {
> int i, total;
>
> for(i = 0, total = 0; i < NUM_CHILDS; ++i)
> {
> if(CHILD_INFO_TABLE[i].senv == CHILD_INFO_TABLE[child_num].senv &&
> (!(CHILD_INFO_TABLE[i].type == CHILD_TYPE_PROCESSOR &&
> CHILD_INFO_TABLE[i].status == CHILD_STATUS_STANDBY)))
> {
> total++;
> }
> }
>
> return total;
> }
>
> And this condition:
> (idle_processors (i) > 1 || total_processes (i) == 1)
>
> resolves this feature
>
> _______________________________________________
> Peruser mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://www.telana.com/mailman/listinfo/peruser
>
>
_______________________________________________
Peruser mailing list
[email protected]
http://www.telana.com/mailman/listinfo/peruser
