On Tue, 2007-09-11 at 11:57 +0300, Janno Sannik wrote: > And about performane: it is noticeably faster :)
I did a few test with apachebench on my test machine. Five concurrent requests with a five minute timeout, to a .txt file containing the text "Hello World". Apache is configured with a MaxKeepAlive of 100. KeepAlive off: 210340 requests KeepAlive on: 309369 requests That's an increase of 47% if I did my math right, though it's not a very realistic benchmark. I also tested it through the Pound proxy, if anyone else is running a setup similar to mine. w/Pound, KeepAlive off: 134499 requests w/Pound, KeepAlive on: 262078 requests This makes a significant difference with Pound, a 15% performance hit compared to directly connecting to apache; with KeepAlive off, it's about 34%. Enabling KeepAlive with the new patch improves the performance of Pound+Apache by a whopping 95% (according to this simplistic benchmark anyway). -- Sean Gabriel Heacock Telana Internet Services http://www.telana.com/ _______________________________________________ Peruser mailing list [email protected] http://www.telana.com/mailman/listinfo/peruser
