i think writing a table with test results for different configurations would be usefull to find optimal way for configuration. what do you think should this table contain to be usefull?
Stefan Rieger schrieb: > Hi > > I've tried some weeks ago the 0.4 Patch (not rc1) on an productiv system > with 972 vHosts and 440 users with the same problems. After a view Minutes > we got no Response from the Server. > > System MemTotal: 8,313,596 kB on AMD Opterons > > Which config settings are recommendable? > > Maybe i can test it again ... late at night ;) > > - Stefan > > --- Original Nachricht --- > Absender: WebMaster / XTRM Hosting Services > Datum: 01.12.2009 6:38 Uhr > >> I'm trying Peruser rc1 on a server with over 41 thousand visitors daily >> unique to this server… >> >> >> >> Intel(R) Core(TM)2 Quad CPU Q9400 @ 2.66GHz , 4 cores >> >> Real memory: 7.79 GB total >> >> >> >> I built an RPM with apache 2.2.14 and I use it with mod_php, It works >> fine processor takes few resources but I increased RAM usage and note >> this information in the Apache error log >> >> >> >> [Mon Nov 30 23:09:57 2009] [warn] (9)Bad file descriptor: >> apr_socket_opt_set: (TCP_NODELAY) >> >> [Mon Nov 30 23:09:57 2009] [warn] (9)Bad file descriptor: >> apr_socket_opt_set: (TCP_NODELAY) >> >> [Mon Nov 30 23:09:57 2009] [warn] (9)Bad file descriptor: >> apr_socket_opt_set: (TCP_NODELAY) >> >> [Mon Nov 30 23:10:00 2009] [warn] (9)Bad file descriptor: >> apr_socket_opt_set: (TCP_NODELAY) >> >> [Mon Nov 30 23:12:43 2009] [warn] (9)Bad file descriptor: >> apr_socket_opt_set: (TCP_NODELAY) >> >> [Mon Nov 30 23:23:33 2009] [warn] (9)Bad file descriptor: >> apr_socket_opt_set: (TCP_NODELAY) >> >> [Mon Nov 30 23:24:06 2009] [warn] (9)Bad file descriptor: >> apr_socket_opt_set: (TCP_NODELAY) >> >> [Mon Nov 30 23:24:06 2009] [warn] (9)Bad file descriptor: >> apr_socket_opt_set: (TCP_NODELAY) >> >> [Mon Nov 30 23:28:42 2009] [warn] (9)Bad file descriptor: >> apr_socket_opt_set: (TCP_NODELAY) >> >> [Mon Nov 30 23:28:42 2009] [warn] (9)Bad file descriptor: >> apr_socket_opt_set: (TCP_NODELAY) >> >> [Mon Nov 30 23:29:48 2009] [warn] invalid virtualhost for this child! >> (www.com) >> >> [Mon Nov 30 23:31:00 2009] [warn] invalid virtualhost for this child! >> (www.com <http://www.com>) >> >> >> >> Why do these errors happen?, Are normal or should I change something in >> configuration. >> >> Thanks for your help and if you need more information or think they can >> help in test characteristics for peruser-rc1, just let me know! >> >> >> >> KoGt2S >> >> >> >> >> ------------------------------------------------------------------------ >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Peruser mailing list >> [email protected] >> http://www.telana.com/mailman/listinfo/peruser >> > > > > _______________________________________________ > Peruser mailing list > [email protected] > http://www.telana.com/mailman/listinfo/peruser > _______________________________________________ Peruser mailing list [email protected] http://www.telana.com/mailman/listinfo/peruser
