Hi folks,

 

We have a taxidermied polar bear which was recently looked at carefully
after years behind 'glass'.  One - yes, just one - empty dermestid
casing was found on it.   A local conservator thinks we should have the
object treated for insects and tested for arsenic/mercuric salts before
we do anything restorative.

 

I have mixed feelings about the need for the arsenic testing since the
object will be going back on exhibit out of visitor access and I would
assume that any reputable taxidermist would be cautious about handling
old mounts during the conservation process.   However, I'd appreciate
some viewpoints about this.

 

Also, barring other visible signs of infestation for 4 years or more,
should we subject the mount to some undisclosed form of
'insect-proofing'?   Or...are we inviting trouble?   I'd like to know
what methods are going to be used to 'insect-proof' the mount before we
give the go-ahead even if it is deemed the responsible thing to do.

 

Any viewpoints or suggestions?  Comments?   Many thanks in advance.

 

Telephone or email me directly if you'd prefer.

 

Shirley S. Albright

Manager, Technology and Museum Information Systems

 

New Jersey State Museum

240 W. State St., 14th floor

PO Box 530

Trenton, NJ  08625-0530

(office)  609.292.6331

(fax)      609.292.7636 

 

Reply via email to