I suspect that the important difference is that keratins contain sulfur and 
 silk (fibroin) does not.
 
Cathy Hawks
 
In a message dated 5/21/2010 1:21:49 P.M. Eastern Daylight Time,  
[email protected] writes:

As I understand it, silk is a protein similar to  keratin called fibroin.
Tom is right that although soiled silk is eaten  by beetles and moths, they 
will eventually die out if you try and rear them on  a diet of clean silk.
Pest digestion is a very complex and not very  well understood science. See 
for example Cox and Pinniger "Biology, behaviour  and sustainable control 
of Tineola bisselliella".2007 JSPR 43 
Foods with high sugar levels are rarely attacked  in the food industry and 
years ago at CSL we determined that booklice and  other insects would not 
live on pure sucrose.
I do not know what the starches and sugars are in  wood which make it more 
nutritious, I am sure if you look up some of Hickin's  papers, he will tell 
you.
David

----- Original Message ----- 
From:  [email protected]_ (mailto:[email protected])  
To: [email protected]_ (mailto:[email protected])  
Sent: Friday, May 21, 2010 5:17  PM
Subject: Re: [pestlist] Sucrose and  wood


Steve -
 
Silk does NOT contain keratin, a nutrient necessary for the development  of 
fabric pests.  If silk is attacked by silverfish or carpet beetles,  
they're after the sizing, not the silk.
 
Tom





-----Original  Message-----
From: Pine, Steve <[email protected]_ (mailto:[email protected]) >
To: [email protected]_ (mailto:[email protected]) 
Sent:  Fri, May 21, 2010 10:29 am
Subject: RE: [pestlist] Sucrose and  wood

  
 
Thanks  Tom.  I’ve read that and yet find myself wondering if there is a  
limiting factor at work similar to what we find with varied carpet beetles  
preferring wool to silk though both are ready sources of protein.  I  found 
myself wondering why otherwise there isn’t a history of wood borers  
infesting refined sugar?  That must be too simplistic but you get what  I mean.
Steve  

 
From: [email protected]_ 
(mailto:[email protected])   
[_mailto:[email protected]_ 
(mailto:[email protected]?) ]  On Behalf Of [email protected]_ 
(mailto:[email protected]) 
Sent:  Thursday, May 20, 2010 12:38 PM
To: [email protected]_ (mailto:[email protected]) 
Subject:  Re: [pestlist] Sucrose and wood

 
 
Steve  -

 


 
Certain  wood boring beetles are confined to the sapwood of hardwoods 
(because of the  sugar content) and others to the sapwood of softwoods.  The 
real 
 powderpost beetles (Lyctidae) prefer woods high in sugar content; hence 
they  often infest bamboo and of course hardwoods.  The Old and New House  
Borers prefer the sapwood of softwoods.  The nutrient value for the  beetles is 
highest in the sapwood.

 


 
I  am not certain of the type of sugar found in these materials  naturally. 
 Someone else will have to answer that question.  Does  a sugar maple have 
sucrose or some other form of sugar?  What's the  sugar in bamboo?

 


 
Tom  Parker

 
 
-----Original  Message-----
From: Pine, Steve <[email protected]_ (mailto:[email protected]) >
To: [email protected]_ (mailto:[email protected]) 
Sent:  Thu, May 20, 2010 12:17 pm
Subject: RE: [pestlist] Sucrose and  wood
 
 
 
 
 
 
I  attended a presentation recently that brought up a question that I couldn
’t  answer so I’m bringing it to the group.  In a conservation treatment 
of  waterlogged wood a process of consolidation was utilized where a thinned  
concentration of sucrose in water would be added to the wood structure as a 
 bulking agent that would also impart more strength to support the weakened 
 wood structure and retain the object’s shape.  It has been in use since  
the mid 80’s when Jim Parrent developed the process.   At that  time it was 
his opinion that the added sucrose would not increase the  likelihood of 
infestation.  I can visualize the connection between the  starches wood borers 
digest and the chemical relationship to simple sugars  but wasn’t clear on 
how to justify that the borers wouldn’t be attracted to  the sucrose.  My 
guess is that there are enzymes and nutritional  regulators that preclude the 
borers from processing sucrose.  Can  someone explain why or that my 
assumption is wrong?

 
Thanks  for the help.

 
Steve

 


 


 
Steven  L. Pine
Decorative Arts Conservator
The Museum of Fine Arts,  Houston
P.O. Box 6826
Houston, TX 77265
[email protected]_ (mailto:[email protected])   


 


 
















Catharine Hawks
Conservator
2419 Barbour Road
Falls Church  VA 22043-3026 USA
t/f 703.876.9272
mobile  703.200.4370

Reply via email to