This is a message from the Museumpests List.
To post to this list send it as an email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe please look at the footer of this email.
-----------------------------------------------------------
It seems that whenever the topic of anoxia comes up, there are two schools of 
thought:  those who think oxygen scavengers are the best method, and those who 
think inert gasses are more effective.  Does anyone know if there has been a 
good comparative study?  I'm finding a good amount of literature supporting one 
side or another, but so far nothing that makes a direct comparison of the 
effectiveness of each method.

The information contained in this message and/or attachments is intended only 
for the person or entity to which it is addressed and may contain confidential 
and/or privileged material.  Any review, retransmission, dissemination or other 
use of, or taking of any action in reliance upon, this information by persons 
or entities other than the intended recipient is prohibited.  If you received 
this in error, please contact the sender and delete the material from any 
system and destroy any copies.  Any views expressed in this message are those 
of the individual sender.


----------------------------------------------------------------------
To send an email to the list, send your msg to [email protected]

To unsubscribe from this list send an email to [email protected] and in 
the subject put:
"unsubscribe" - no quotes please.

You are receiving the Pestlist emails in standard mode.
To change to the DIGEST mode send an 
email to [email protected] with this command in the body:

set mode digest pestlist

Any problems email [email protected] or [email protected]

Reply via email to