Without being able to get block level access to the disks by  
installing software on the host which runs the disks (or getting a low  
enough level access, maybe NBD?) then I really think you're going to  
struggle to do it any faster.

Sorry if this doesn't help much, hopefully someone can prove me wrong.

Andy

On 6 Sep 2008, at 20:04, Phil Thompson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> I need to clone an HDD from one machine to several, preferably using a
> network attached storage (NAS) drive.
>
> The NAS drive is a windows / SAMBA share an I can mount that as /mnt/ 
> nas1/
>
> The software provided for the task (Acronis TrueImage 10) has the
> disadvantage of not being able to see the original SATA drive however
> Ubuntu etc don't have this problem.
>
> I have had one run at it using the dd command piped via gzip to put a
> compressed image on the NAS, this worked but took over two hours via  
> Gig
> Ethernet. The HDD is 80 GB and the average data transfer was 10  
> Mbytes/s
>  so it is practically mapping the drive byte for byte.
>
> Is there a more elegant / faster method ?
>
> I'll try a USB external HDD to see if the data rate is better, but it
> would be nice to reduce the amount of data being shifted too.
>
> There is a lot of free space on the HDD but dd apparently copies
> everything "blindly".
>
> Phil
>
> _______________________________________________
> Peterboro mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://mailman.lug.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/peterboro

_______________________________________________
Peterboro mailing list
[email protected]
https://mailman.lug.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/peterboro

Reply via email to