On Tue, 4 May 2010 10:51:58 -0700, Barry Smith <bsmith at mcs.anl.gov> wrote: > Absolutely. It does not belong in some centralized place; it > belongs with each chunk of code. > > In fact, could/should we move it into the source files directly > and thus not need a file with this meta-data at all. The python tool > can just as easily get it out of the source files then the makefile. > (Currently there is one copy of this data per directory, it is not per > file; should we change it to per file, I'm not sure.)
If you were to move it into the source file, it could be as simple as #if PETSC_HAVE_XXX /* body of file */ #endif in which case the Python tool (or any build system for that matter) doesn't have to learn whether it should be built or not. I'm not convinced this is better, but it is simpler if your goal is to be able to just dump a bunch of files on a new build system and get correct behavior (all you would need is a way to exclude examples from the library, but most systems have a way to ignore directories matching a given filter). Jed
