I just want to discuss the solution of the problem. I don't want to make any trouble for the mail list. Sorry for the effect, I didn't know it before.
Best Regards, David On Wed, Mar 24, 2010 at 12:50 PM, Jed Brown <jed at 59a2.org> wrote: > This of course is the reason that David Sheehan keeps replying to > petsc-dev, despite numerous requests to move it to petsc-maint. > > The literature on why this is bad is plentiful. > > http://www.unicom.com/pw/reply-to-harmful.html > > http://woozle.org/~neale/papers/reply-to-still-harmful.html > > I know many mailers are broken and don't have proper "reply-to-list" > functionality. I know this isn't the first time this has come up, and I > understand that turning off the munging might cause more problems than > it fixes, but I'd just like to point out the situation. > > Jed > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.mcs.anl.gov/pipermail/petsc-dev/attachments/20100324/5cc42caf/attachment.html>
